Skip to main content
Quick links

12 Jul 2021

Crossbreeding can reduce methane gas emissions by around 6%

According to a recent study, “The impact of crossbreeding and feed efficiency on methane emission”, led by SimHerd, crossbred cows can reduce methane gas emissions by up to 6% compared to pure Holstein cows.

The study was conducted using the simulation model, SimHerd, and is part of the DairyCross project, founded by Green Innovation and Demonstration Foundation in Denmark, in which other key institutions are also participating.

Ruth Davis Kring, Consultant at SimHerd, explains that in the simulation model they have plenty of different specifications to measure heterosis and breed differences.

“All those parameters were put into the model so that when we run it the model can predict what the effect would be in the herd going from a pure breed Holstein to a crossbred herd with given breed combinations. Some of those effects may be related to ­methane emissions”.

She adds that the main driver of the decrease in methane is the reduction of youngstock.

“The primary reason is that crossbred cows live longer, so you don’t need as many replacement animals, resulting in a smaller youngstock herd. When you have fewer animals, you lower methane emissions at herd level”.

She adds that the reason why crossbred cows live longer is that they are more robust, healthier, and are more fertile; thus, there is no need to replace them as quickly as the pure Holstein cows.

A case herd was modelled in the study, with 200 purebred Holstein cows.

Different crossbreeding strategies

The replacement rate for pure Holstein was 40.7%, for the different crossbreeding strategies, this was reduced to -6.3% for the two-way cross with RDM, -7.7% for the breeds under the ProCROSS concept, and -7.8% for the breeds marketed as VikingGoldenCross.

Davis is convinced of crossbreeding’s ability to reduce methane gas emissions at the farm level. “It can be part of the solution to face ­climate change and global warming challenges”, she states.

The amount of methane per kg ECM is lower for both the two-way and three-way crosses, 4.2%,4.7%, and 6.6 % respectively. This is due to more healthy animals which live longer, and because fewer replacement heifers are required.

The breeds in the study

Two-crosses between Holstein (HOL) and VikingRed (RDC). The breeds under the ProCROSS (Holstein x RDC x Montbeliarde) and VikingGoldenCross (Holstein x RDC x Jersey) were also compared.

SimHerd in brief

The breeding consultants in Denmark, Sweden and Finland, use SimHerd to help set the best breeding strategy in their herds and calculate the economic impact of different management changes.

“Crossbred cows live longer, so you don’t need as many replacement animals, resulting in a smaller youngstock herd".

Ruth Davis Kring, Consultant at SimHerd.

 

The amount of methane per kg ECM is lower for both the two-way and three-way crosses, 4.2%, 4.7% and 6.6% respectively.

 

Holstein

HOL X RDC

ProCROSS

VikingGoldenCross

ECM, kg

10,554

-70

-140

-318

Replacement rate, %

40.7

-6.3

-7.7

-7.8

Youngstock

195

-33

-39

-42

Calving interval, days

397

-6

-8

-9

Mastitis*

35.5

-2.9

-1.2

-0.1

Net herd profit, €**

2,175

+92

+101

+37

g CH4/kg ECM***

20.01

-0.84

-0.95

-1.33

diff CH4, %

 

-4.2

-4.7

-6.6

* Disease treatment per 100 cows. 

** Per cow-year.

*** Output based on the SimHerd methane model.

Explore more about VikingGoldenCross